Crowley the Father of Psychedelic culture and of drug induced expansion of consciousness

 

The western and eastern traditions of expanding consciousness and becoming divine was researched by Crowley. The Modern day culture has much to do with the influence of Crowley.

Concerning the idea of Crowley as father of the psychedelic revolution, it is sometimes claimed that, in October, 1930, during his time in Berlin, he ‘gave mescal to, amongst others, the youthful Aldous Huxley’ (King 2013: 138). James Webb even claims that there is ‘first hand evidence’ provided by ‘a former disciple of Crowley’ (1976: 439, 482; see also, Churton 2014: 171-172).

This would, of course, be significant, in that it would establish a very clear historical link between Crowley and the psychedelic counterculture. Unfortunately, it is hampered by a comprehensive lack of evidence. There is little doubt that the two briefly met during the evening of October 4 at the Müncher Hofbrau, but there is no evidence that they took mescaline together or that it was even a topic of conversation. Indeed, not only does Huxley never mention the encounter with Crowley, but there is not the slightest suggestion of him ever having taken the drug prior to 1953, when he declared to Humphry Osmond, ‘I am eager to make the experiment and would feel particularly happy to do so under the supervision of an experienced investigator like yourself’ (Huxley, quoted in Murray 2003: 399).

https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/84818/1/Crowley_on_Drugs.pdf

what Psychologist and scientists have gotten wrong because of their rigid philosophy of science

 1. On Addiction - Jordan Peterson recently stated to an ex-addict (cocaine and alcohol) that he needs a new goal to overcome the problem. Even though the addict in question had everything, house, money, jobs and family. The understanding of addiction from a spiritual angle is left out. The demonic involvement is negated as a principle. Even the whole principle that addiction is purely psychological needs more research.

2. On IQ - changes amongst and interpretations. Continuous redefinitions and refinements by psychiatrists. until Feynman and whole bunch of Nobel Prize winners and "geniuses" were found to have IQ's less than 135. This led them to have a baseline of 125. This again is problematic it was just taking Feymans 125 reading as a baseline. 

IQ Tests fail in that deep state of consciousness thinking cannot be tested (and is not used within the stupid "genius" classification) and limited to a time trial exercise. Processing in a time limit cannot give a whole understanding of the brain.  

3. On spiritual elements regarding health, illnesses,  The evil eye. A host of material is out there.

The whole field where demonic interventions are not understood by practitioners from a western sense. Islamic practitioners with skills in both fields have been attempting to fill this gap.

4. understanding consciousness - The Hard problem.

5. Understanding of evolution.

6. Understanding of Pre cognition. 

7. Evolution

David icke and Rastafarians - What they have in common ?

 From an Abrahamic perspective more specifically an Islamic one The Jinns, Shaitans (spirits and devils) are real.

Their role and effects on making people ill, suffering, temptation, magic and suicide is clear for anyone "in the know" or whose heart has been opened up.

What is interesting though that in Islam we have more specific details in terms of their (the devils) plan. That is to tempt people into the worship of Idols, creation, and the spirits themselves.

For brevity i will pick two people, David Icke and Rastafarians. 

David has symptoms associated with demonic contact (automatic writing, prescience, channeling, hallucinations etc.) which i have heard throughout his speeches,  Rastafarians smoke "weed" which as the Quran states "is the Handiwork of the Devil" similar to shamanic tribes and pagan ritual worship.

 Both call to pure paganism. One to the creation the other to a man.

 

How sick are the western elites -- lessons from the Iraq War

 In 1990 when saddam hussein invaded Kuwait and was pushed out with ease by the Americans a question was posed at the time why didn't the Americans move on and topple saddam.

One of the reasons given (which is in youtube somewhere) was that it would cause mass sectarianism and destruction to Iraq. Given this knowledge the 2003 invasion was a "Sick" enterprise with "full knowledge of the destruction of Iraq.

How sick is the West? Or the Elites? This sickness is a hidden sickness within the foreign policy and machinations of those in power.

Argumentation and the apparent argument.

 In argument what is "being argued" is often structured (particular) in (belief arguments) on the roots of the belief and prejudices. The arguments themselves cannot be defeated because the roots of the argument (ie. the roots of the tree) are at risk. For example, an argument about immigration by someone who has a white supremacist belief structure, is not really about the benefits of immigration or lack thereof to that person.

The ability to see who is sincere and not is a requirement for engaging in an argument. 

Interestingly Wittgenstein proposed a kind of metadata for language. A new framework for language itself.