Innocence of Muslims part 2

The recent film controversy "Innocence of Muslims" involving the disgusting forgeries against the Prophet Mohammad and Islam was not NOT banned under the current president of the United states of America under the (almost divine entrusted) constitutional principle of  "Freedom of speech"

What is the problem with this ?

Is is an issue regarding the Freedom of speech? Rather the problem is  a moral and philosophical issue.

Freedom of speech has Limits, despite the apparent Facade. You are not "Free" to say what you want since you maybe threatened by arrest of "Hate crimes", "Racism" or even "Terrorism" just to give you a few examples.

So, freedom of speech has limits, but these limits have not penetrated into "Defaming God and his prophets" At least the prophets of mass recognized religions. So again i state this is a moral and philosophical deficiency in U.S. or democracy that race, sexuality, politics, is held in higher esteem than God and the  best creation of Earth,  his prophets and messengers. Who are not protected by Law from the tongues of devils.


.

Innocence of Muslims (film controversy)

interesting points made by br. Tzortis on the film controversy

http://soundcloud.com/rasman62/interview-of-hamza-a-tzortzis

A) That we (Muslims) should take the moral high ground

B) That it's not befitting of a civilization to mock and be derogatory in this way, promoting a clash of civilizations

C) That there are limits in speech in every context that we shouldn't cross, e,g, insulting a teacher in school you would be kicked out